Search for: "Does 1-21" Results 281 - 300 of 17,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by war
An internet referencing service provider which stores, as a keyword, a sign identical with a trade mark and organises the display of advertisements on the basis of that keyword does not use that sign within the meaning of Article 5(1) and (2) of Directive 89/104 or of Article 9(1) of Regulation No 40/94. 3. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:09 am
(Williams, Carrie)However, the language of the order seems to say that responses are only stayed as to John Does #21 and #37. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:13 am
Wilson : Motion Hearing held on 9/25/2007 re [14] MOTION for protective order or in thealternative to quash ex parte subpoena filed by Doe #37, Doe #21. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:47 pm by Luke Rioux
The indictment currently does not name co-conspirators or a specific location of the conspiracy and alleges conduct from 2/21/13 to 2/22/13. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:11 am by Rose Hughes
 As interpreted by the Boards of Appeal so far, what G 2/21 did do was to clarify that a technical effect relied on for inventive step does not need to be disclosed in the application as filed (Cf. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm by Jon
ENACTMENT AND REPEALS.Statutes codified in 18 USC Chapter 13 and in 42 USCChapter 21 are hereby amended as follows:1. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
In brief: 21 CFR 807 Subpart E describes requirements for a 510(k) submission. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
 The Advocate General's ruling came on 21 March 20111 in Case C-323/09, 21 March 2011, noted by the IPKat here.Next came "the latest battle in a long war of attrition" (per Lord Justice Lewison), a.k.a. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:36 am by Lisa Lee Lewis (UK) and John Coley (UK)
The FMLC notes that questions 1 and 2 of the joint consultation focus on the requirement in 5MLD that express trusts are registered. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:32 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But does it have to be this way? [read post]