Search for: "Dress for Less, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2013, 9:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Noninfringing uses are less tangible, not advanced by army of advocates, less obvious at onset of technology. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Smith, University of Louisville, What if eBay Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
" U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 03, 2008 Villegas v Gilroy Garlic Festival, No. 05-15725 "In a civil rights action against the City of Gilroy and the Gilroy Garlic Festival Association, alleging First Amendment violations involving the festival's dress code, summary judgment to defendants and a holding of no state action or municipal liability are affirmed where: 1) the festival association is not a state actor; and 2) the City had no part in forming the… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Craig scouted the building for the work and signed a contract with the building’s then-owner Boydell Development Corporation, agreeing that the work was “intended to be long lasting for the Northend community” and that the mural would “remain on the building for no less than a ten year time period. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Craig scouted the building for the work and signed a contract with the building’s then-owner Boydell Development Corporation, agreeing that the work was “intended to be long lasting for the Northend community” and that the mural would “remain on the building for no less than a ten year time period. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:42 am by Randy Coleman
  According to the VA Pension Program Final Report, from ORC MacroEconomic Systems, Inc., in 2010 there were more than 700,000 military veterans in the US who are entitled to various pensions and other benefits, who have no awareness of those entitlements, and therefore are not receiving what the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
  By the way, the testimony quoted at the top of the post is from an unpublished decision in Matter of O'Brien (Academe Paving, Inc.), Index No. 99-2594 (Sup Ct Broome County Sept. 25, 2000). [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:28 am
"Re-printed with Permission © 2009 Lawyers Weekly Inc., All Rights Reserved. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:32 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Bureau of Police for Town of Morristown, 958 F. 2d 1242 (3d Cir. 1992) and Tenafly Eruv Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:51 am by Joy Waltemath
” The employees cited to the Eighth Circuit’s opinion in J-McDaniel Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Craig scouted the building for the work and signed a contract with the building’s then-owner Boydell Development Corporation, agreeing that the work was “intended to be long lasting for the Northend community” and that the mural would “remain on the building for no less than a ten year time period. [read post]
Since the revised COPPA Rule came into effect, the FTC is certainly looking more closely at less traditional areas where violations may occur. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Craig scouted the building for the work and signed a contract with the building’s then-owner Boydell Development Corporation, agreeing that the work was “intended to be long lasting for the Northend community” and that the mural would “remain on the building for no less than a ten year time period. [read post]