Search for: "Duck v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2018, 10:48 am
– Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzThat old adage, “if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck” holds true for…waterfowl and a host of persons, places and things, but not for greenhouses in the recent Ohio Board of Tax Appeals decision, Viola Associates, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
Ohio State won their last one by beating a team famous for trick plays and a duck mascot. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Arkinson, in which a unanimous SCOTUS assured us that if a bankruptcy court is confronted with a state law issue masquerading as a “core” issue—such as, in this case, a fraudulent transfer lawsuit—that invokes the specter of Stern v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hernández Almodóvar passed along another Puerto Rico Second Amendment case, this one a trial court decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm by Unknown
When considering the opt-in to Subchapter V the debtor and its lawyers must have their ducks lined up because it is not anticipated that Courts will be willing to grant an extension to a debtor who pleads it’s not prepared to file his plan. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm by Unknown
When considering the opt-in to Subchapter V the debtor and its lawyers must have their ducks lined up because it is not anticipated that Courts will be willing to grant an extension to a debtor who pleads it’s not prepared to file his plan. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 7:36 am by Peter Spiro
 After a 30-year silence, the Court read into immigration federalism last term with Whiting v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am by Steve Vladeck
In light of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari yesterday to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]