Search for: "Duncan v State"
Results 281 - 300
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
Dearman v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg,… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
*** * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Duncan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
The Court denied the State of Michigan’s motion to deem the Court’s December 22, 2010 remarks as a final order in the matter of Duncan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:39 am
Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Burnip v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals said in Duncan v Kelly, 9 N.Y.3d 102, a probationary employee may be discharged for "almost any reason, or for no reason at all" as long as the decision is not made "in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
Duncan (2007) __ Cal.App.4th __ (formerly Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 290 v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
See, e.g., Duncan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
Lohrmann v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:55 am
In 1999, in a case called General Electric Company v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
State, No. 101,078 (Shawnee)State appeal (transfer)Jean K. [read post]
