Search for: "E. C. D." Results 281 - 300 of 20,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Pix Credit here Lo que fue en su tiempo una revolución de jóvenes valientes, audaces, creativos, se convertía con el paso del tiempo, de su institucionalización y aferramiento a los mecanismos del poder, en algo esencialemente conservador hasta transformarse en una gerontorcracia renuente a cualquier renovación efectiva. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:27 pm by Jason Kelley
  Design features include but are not limited to  (A) infinite scrolling or auto play;  (B) rewards for time spent on the platform;  (C) notifications;  (D) personalized recommendation systems;  (E) in-game purchases; or  (F) appearance altering filters. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. iv. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by Marie-Thérèse Eugénio
C’est donc maintenant au législateur français d’intervenir afin d’essayer de trouver un compromis étant précisé que de nombreux sujets restent à trancher par ce dernier notamment celui de la durée de la rétroactivité à prendre en compte qui pourrait aller jusqu’à 15 ans (si l’on se réfère à la décision de la CJUE de 2009)… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
The Board considered the usual Section 2(e)(4) factors. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
  The bill would make commission of the “caller identification spoofing” offense a Class E felony. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm by Guest Author
Similarly, writing last month on Notice & Comment, Cato Institution fellow Thomas Berry argued that “forcing every platform to use identical viewpoint-neutral moderation rules would be a profound infringement on the editorial freedom that has produced a range of social media experiences” and that “[b]eing forced to carry, support, or subsidize speech that one opposes is itself a First Amendment injury. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
D’Amico, 2019 SCC 23, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 394, at para. 3. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Carignan c. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm by Michael Oykhman
This is authorized as a secondary offence listed under s. 487.04 (c), (d) or (e), and the DNA order can be authorized regardless of if the Crown proceeds summarily or by indictment. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:24 am by Michael Oykhman
This is authorized as a secondary offence listed under s. 487.04 (c), (d) or (e), and the DNA order can be authorized regardless of if the Crown proceeds summarily or by indictment. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]