Search for: "Eli Lilly "
Results 281 - 300
of 2,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 11:54 am
Eli Lilly and the International Investment Law Challenge to a Neo-Federal IP Regime by Jason W. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:54 am
Eli Lilly and the International Investment Law Challenge to a Neo-Federal IP Regime by Jason W. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:23 am
Richard Bell’s internet-scouring spiders have apparently found another batch of entities that used his Indianapolis skyline photograph, including a big name, Eli Lilly and Company. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 4:54 am
Eli Lilly claimed that the marketing done by Mylan infringed their patent. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
Brian Cordery and Laura ReynoldsOn Friday 1 March 2019, Arnold J handed down his judgment in the patent dispute between Eli Lilly and Genentech regarding IL-17A/F antibodies*1. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1564–65 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
This year's paper was arguably made even more challenging by the introduction on the syllabus for the first time of the principles of the doctrine of equivalents as established by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Eli Lilly (which even UK judges are still working out how to apply...). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:03 am
Indiana’s Senate Public Policy Committee voted 9-1 in favor of a hate crime bill after a three-hour hearing that featured testimony in support of the bill by several of Indiana’s more prominent corporate citizens, including the Indiana Pacers basketball team, the Indianapolis Colts football team, Eli Lilly and Co., Anthem Healthcare and the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:47 am
Joost DuijmOn 16 January 2019, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company’s patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:03 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:45 am
Bart van WezenbeekRelevant prior art may prove not to be useful as a starting point for an attack on inventive step if the prior art teaching is negated by later studies before the effective date of the patent claims. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Ever since Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) dragged equivalence into the UK patent infringement system there has been an open question regarding the future of the so-called 'Gillette defence'. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am
Based on the Pemetrexed-decision of the German Federal Supreme Court (docket-no X ZR 29/15, also known as Actavis v Eli Lilly), the Court of Appeal made it clear that Swiss-type claims are to be treated in the same way as so-called EPC 2000-claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The new year sees the issue of yet another UK court case applying the doctrine of equivalents as established by the UK Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) ("Actavis"). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:23 am
” Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:19 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
Sources[1] Eli Lilly and Company. (2019, January 7). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:09 am
Eli Lilly case The Actavis ./. [read post]
