Search for: "Elias v Elias" Results 281 - 300 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal (Pill and Elias LJJ and Sharp J) heard the appeal against the decision of Eady J in Ashcroft v Foley ([2011] EWHC 1710 (QB)), as reported above. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 2 and 3 March 2015, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google (part heard from 8 December 2014)(the Case Tracker is characteristically inaccurate, showing the court as the Master of the Rolls, Elias and Sales LJJ). [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
  Rules create the so-called “bright lines” between entitlement and disentitlement; rules are also, by their nature,  insensitive to particular household circumstances.In two recent decisions of the the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeal Chamber, the rules have been challenged as being insufficiently sensitive to individual household needs: RG v SSWP and North Wiltshire DC (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) and IB v Birmingham CC [2011] UKUT 23 (AAC). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The second AP report, "Calif. scrambled for execution drug," is by Paul Elias. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:51 pm by Gustavo Arballo
 "Votan" Marcelo Alegre, Susana Cayuso, Sebastián Elias, Alberto Garay, Lucas Grosman, Roberto Gargarella, Santiago Legarre, Carlos Rosenkrantz y Martín Farrell. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:26 am
In [2011] EWCA Civ 890 the Chancellor of the High Court, together with Lords Justices Jackson and Elias, took just 51 paragraphs to affirm the position taken by Proudman J. [read post]