Search for: "Ex Parte Vs"
Results 281 - 300
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 11:45 am
Alimony vs. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
Why just the other day, Austin Defender pointed us to a similar Texas case: In Ex parte Kinnett, for example, a guy dumped his meth in the toilet. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:07 am
"Weiner vs. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:29 pm
“Hard Law vs. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
That's not why I'm writing; as a civil litigator, though, this part from ATL’s post piqued my interest: Does this mean that Ung gets his life back? [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:12 am
Creative Commons 990 Ex BBrewster Kahle is not likely a name you recognize. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
No Exit: Ten Years of ‘Privacy vs. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:15 am
On 18th December 2012 this court granted urgent ex parte ad-interim reliefs. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:53 pm
For example, nearly all analyses of habeas center around the federal writ (Guantanamo Bay, etc.), but most prisoners (around 93%) are incarcerated in state systems and the examination of state-level habeas processes like those in Ex Parte Robbins are mostly ignored in policy debates. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
Courtney (Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Patents US: Patentable subject matter at the BPAI: Ex parte Kelker; Ex parte MacKenzie; Ex parte Venkata (Patent Docs) Challenging the clear and convincing standard of proof for invalidating patents in court: Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (on petition for certiorari 2010) (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions Card Activation Technologies tripped up in patent reexamination? [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Highlights this week included: USPTO expands first action interview pilot program (inovia) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) US ITC report on China piracy shows billions in losses: Senators demand action (IP Watch) (IP Dragon) Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
Notre départ n'est pas négociable. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
., April 27, 2009> SETTLED · · [4-17] ABC Financial Services pays $20K to settle pregnancy/discharge suit by EEOC; EEOC PR here · · Ashley Cnty changes policy to settle EEOC ADA complaint; will no longer require ees to report possible side effects from drugsCA> DECIDED · · St Ct App: Affirms JV for $1.1M+ vs Pasadena FD for subjecting a firefighter to a fitness-for-duty examination and… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:24 am
" An example that I've heard about, from a few years back, concerns Turbo Tax and how to allocate business vs. personal use regarding expenses that relate to a second home which one also rents out. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
.'It is very interesting to compare AK Roy and several subsequent cases which have taken the same route with a British case decided by the far less 'activist' House of Lords:In Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) the House of Lords held that it was unlawful for the Home Secretary to introduce changes to a scheme which were incompatible with an Act of Parliament. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:06 am
Well, at least the headache part. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:39 pm
“La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH) estableció en el caso Soler vs. [read post]
29 May 2021, 11:09 am
” Through Twitter statements and interviews from the CEO, “Franklin Templeton perpetuated and legitimized the story of “Karen” vs. an innocent African American to its perceived advantage, with reckless disregard for the destruction of Plaintiff’s life in the process. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Under Rule 10 the petition for grant of special leave shall be put up for hearing ex-parte unless there be a caveat. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Article 102(1) empowers the High Court Division to give directions or orders to any person or authority as may be appropriate to enforce any of the fundamental rights conferred in Part III. [read post]