Search for: "F. X. " Results 281 - 300 of 3,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
He used a company run by married couple Gerwig F. and Ina F. to establish contacts with the German research community to realize their objectives. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 3:46 am
""As to the Section 2(f) claim, in light of the ""very highly descriptive nature"" of the mark, Applicant''s scanty evidence (a single website page, but no proof of revenues, extent of advertising, or consumer recognition) was insufficient, despite the fact that Applicant had used the mark in commerce for more than five years.TTABlog comment: I think that the "X" is rather distinctive and should have been enough to push the mark… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
De formation scientifique de haut niveau, les candidats seront de préférence issus d’une école d’ingénieurs (X, Mines, Centrale, SUPELEC, Ponts, ESPCI, …). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
App’x 978, 983 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:05 am by Sami Z Azhari
Pursuant to 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1(f)(1), there are two versions of dissemination under Illinois law. [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:54 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Davis CA, Ciampaglia GL, Aiello LM, Chung K, Conover MD, Ferrara E, Flammini A, Fox GC, Gao X, Gonçalves B, Grabowicz PA, Hong K, Hui P, McCaulay S, McKelvey K, Meiss MR, Patil S, Peli Kankanamalage C, Pentchev V, Qiu J, Ratkiewicz J, Rudnick A, Serrette B, Shiralkar P, Varol O, Weng L, Wu T, Younge AJ, Menczer F. (2016) OSoMe: The IUNI observatory on social media. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
Thanks to The Lawyer, we can point out a blog with a very focused lens on one aspect of patents: those relating to sex toys and similar stuff: X-Ratent Patents. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 7:21 am
(2) The name, address, and other information regarding the lender and settlement agent may be printed in Sections F and H, respectively [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We have also found that a patent applicant need notexpressly state “my invention does not include X” toindicate his exclusion of X from the scope of his patentbecause “the patentee’s choice of preferred embodimentscan shed light on the intended scope of the claims. [read post]