Search for: "F. X. "
Results 281 - 300
of 3,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 8:12 pm
Alere, Inc., 809 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
[x] In reaching that conclusion, the court examined the historical and central significance of the constitutional jury-trial right, finding it to be “one of our most vital barriers to governmental arbitrariness. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Village of Hoffman Estates, 844 F.2d 461, 464 (7th Cir. 1988): Compensation in the constitutional sense is … not full compensation, for market value is not the value that every owner of property attaches to his property but merely the value that the marginal owner attaches to his property. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
Pix credit here It has been quite a treat to sit on the sidelines as the glitterati of the business and human rights communities--its influencers, press organs, shock troops, academics (especially its public intellectuals), think tanks (especially those gambling on relevance among a small circle of enablers), and the units of its discipline inspection shock troops, have, since 2014, engaged in the quite remarkable project of shepherding through the Ottoman hareem that is the United… [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
“How do they have this f–king going on in broad daylight? [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Fowler, 537 F. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
” Her supervisor and co-workers laughed and shouted racist and sexist comments, such as “f**king Asian,” “f**king yellow Asian,” and “f**king stupid b***h. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
Thus, if the University is a school or government building, then Article X does not violate the Second Amendment…. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
[x] Structure of the VA There are two official levels for VA adjudication of claims: Regional office (“RO”) or agency of original jurisdiction (“AOJ”); and Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”)[xi] Claimants may appeal to the Board if they are dissatisfied with the RO’s decision. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:29 am
Some of the x’s are in brackets because they’re not clear yet. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:44 pm
Hatfield, 466 F. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:34 pm
., 599 F. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
App’x 886 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
App’x 919 (11th Cir. 2019) (unpublished per curiam opinion). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
., 4 F.4th 874 (9th Cir. 2021), noting that the panel reasoned that reasonable consumers would use contextual information to conclude that “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey” did not have to be made with honey solely sourced from manuka flowers. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[8] Because of that, Congress could restrict such discrimination against military recruiters without violating the First Amendment.[9] "[I]f an individual announces that he intends to express his disapproval of the Internal Revenue Service by refusing to pay his income taxes," that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to the nonpayment of taxes.[10] Likewise, if a university announces that it is expressing disapproval of the military's… [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:25 pm
Morris, --- F.4th --- (6th Cir. 2023). [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
R. 213(f)(3) The judge need not adopt the expert witness’s opinion. [read post]
