Search for: "FORD v. UNITED STATES"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
June 25, 2002); In re Ford Motor Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:04 pm
Ford: Two of the Three Issues Raised in the Petition are Not Dependent on the United States Supreme Court's Opinion in Williams III California Supreme Court Grants Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
On June 17, 2011, the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed a district judge’s decision to exclude Dr David S. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:30 pm
As each workshop approaches, we will send an email to those on our list with details concerning location and/or accessibility via Zoom.Oct. 19, 2021: Mark Krass, Stanford Law and Political ScienceDebunking the Non-Delegation Doctrine for State Regulation of Federal ElectionsNov. 2, 2021: Margarita Lila Rosa, Lecturer and Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Marginalia: Black Women and Emerging Carceral Geographies in Rio de Janeiro, 1880-1888Nov. 16, 2021: Sara Forsdyke,… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:17 am
Colleen V. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,'… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
– United States District Court – Northern District of Ohio – March 28th, 2019) involves a fire at a residence. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:17 am
Recently, however, it appears the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, in Disher v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:37 am
For example, it published that the United States national average interest rate for five-year certificates of deposit as of December 21, 2005 was 3.95%. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
The first footnote states the base prices that Microsoft multiplied by Motorola's supra-FRAND factor:"A Ford Taurus has a suggested retail price of $26,700. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
Accordingly, we need not address any issues regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.] [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
