Search for: "Facebook v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Supreme Court bolsters rights of children Child detention: more smoke and mirrors Daily Mail on the naughty step over domestic violence case Rate this: Share:EmailDiggLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Discovery of a plaintiff's Facebook information has also been allowed in the federal Middle District Court decision of Offenback v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada It is reported that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has dismissed a CA$210 million defamation claim filed by Subway against the CBC, which had reported the sandwich chain may have been selling some poultry products that were only 50 percent chicken DNA. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
”’ Later that day at 4:54 P.M., Juror B posted again: `Superior Court in Brockton picks me . . . for the trail[ sic ]. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
The case highlighted that the Court will not aid a company which was banned from accessing the Facebook API. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Sharon D. Nelson and John W. Simek
Just last year, a federal district court in Texas affirmed that traditional view, ruling in Nyabwa v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Thomas Knighton, Jeff Sexton & Linda Kidd Pittman (Case No. 10-cv-4279-AM), filed in Henry County Superior Court in November 2010, McBerry sued for defamation, alleging in his Complaint that during the recent gubernatorial campaign, Pittman referred to him as a "child molester" on a Facebook page. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]