Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 18,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 3:11 am
” In other words, the benefits alleged by the government in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In its 2014 decision Harris v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In its 2014 decision Harris v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 4:01 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced an increase in patent fees to take effect on January 19, 2025. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm
Although Lamont v Burton [2007] EWCA Civ 429 and Kilby v Gawith EWCA Civ 812 are authority for the proposition that the courts have no discretion as to whether to allow fixed success fees, does this extend as far as overriding the disclosure or notification requirements? [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:02 pm
However, what if you are awoken from a comatose state only to realize that a contingency fee contract with a law firm was executed on your behalf? [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:23 pm
In Perdue v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:16 am
In 2008, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in Goodyear v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
In Bhattacharjee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
As discussed in earlier posts (here and here) the Delaware Supreme Court in ATP Tour v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:54 pm
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:46 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:00 am
In Parallel Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:49 am
Las Vegas Limited Partnership v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
This issue on the unpaid attorney's fees was fought again and re-stated in a case decided in December 2009. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:10 pm
In Agredano v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
ALLISON V. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
In today’s case (Wilhelmson v. [read post]