Search for: "Green v. Black"
Results 281 - 300
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
Black Entertainment Television) applied to music sampling. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:55 pm
The prosecutors worked conscientiously to exclude the potential black jurors; they marked their names with a “B” and highlighted each black juror’s name in green on four different copies of the juror list. [read post]
25 May 2016, 6:04 am
Justice Thomas dissented, reasoning that a federal employee’s decision to quit was not discrimination and the employer’s alleged discriminatory act occurred outside the limitations period (Green v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Sure, they marked their juror sheets with capital B's next to all the black jurors, then highlighted them in green. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:02 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court in Green v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Williams, 362 N.C. 628, 669 S.E.2d 290, 294 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2008) (quoting In re Appeal of The Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 10:08 am
Calif. 3/29/16), Plaintiff Khasin sought certification of a class of all persons in California who purchased for household use one or more of several green tea products manufactured and sold by Bigelow since May 2, 2008 (a companion case covered black tea products). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
Partnership v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 2:46 pm
The plaintiff’s husband was dressed in dark green shorts and a black shirt at the time. [read post]
