Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Fellowship Info The Nancy Hale Fellows Program is a full-time, 12-month program that comes with a $50,000 annual stipend and two weeks paid vacation, plus healthcare and benefits. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Sales, Lord Mance and Lord Sumption. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm
Lippmann is cited:Unlike in the classic case of Egbert v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Fellowship Info The Nancy Hale Fellows Program is a full-time, 12-month program that comes with a $50,000 annual stipend and two weeks paid vacation, plus healthcare and benefits. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
Lady Hale spots a photographer in the audienceOn Wednesday evening, the President of the UK Supreme Court, Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond (known as Lady Hale) came to speak to IPSoc the society for junior IP lawyers.We were treated to an hour long Q&A from Lady Hale where she covered everything from Star Wars to diversity. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Kerr. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 8:26 am
In Hale v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 8:09 pm
Timothy Holbrook of Emory University School of Law; and Thomas Saunders of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP will discuss how district courts have applied the Supreme Court's decision in WesternGeco v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
The case, discussed at SCOTUSblog, raises the question "Whether Nevada v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 11:49 am
Hale v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:13 am
That’s the lesson to be drawn from Hale v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:13 am
That’s the lesson to be drawn from Hale v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
