Search for: "Hamilton v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 2,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In so ruling, the Second Circuit reiterated that the plaintiff rather than the defendant in a trademark infringement claim bears the burden of proving the likelihood of consumer confusion, and that no particular order of analysis is required as long as the court considers all appropriate factors (Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
In so ruling, the Second Circuit reiterated that the plaintiff rather than the defendant in a trademark infringement claim bears the burden of proving the likelihood of consumer confusion, and that no particular order of analysis is required as long as the court considers all appropriate factors (Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Listen to Ian Hamilton’s (Upload Podcast) discussion with Ellysse Dick, a policy analyst from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) about how privacy, free speech and safety will co-exist in VR/AR here. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:55 pm by Georgialee Lang
Where the application is brought by a plaintiff, the defendant may not simply insist on a full trial in hopes that with the benefit of evidence, ‘something might turn up’: see Hamilton v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
Thanks to Eugene for inviting me to blog about the historical arguments made by the State of New York and its supporting amici in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” The thin-skinned tone might have fans of “Hamilton” remembering King George’s satirical song-lament “Why So Blue? [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In a 2008 interview with CBS News, Scalia declared, “[T]here are anti-abortion people who think that the Constitution requires a state to prohibit abortion. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties’ remaining arguments regarding collateral estoppel and failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
  Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]