Search for: "Hand v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 281 - 291 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
On the other hand, if the voter registration drive systematically turned away voters of one party, that would be campaign intervention. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
But Republican legislators openly advocated for the impeachment of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen in 2016 because of the IRS’s responses to their subpoenas. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:41 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This leads to a network of rights as complex as it is flexible: A tokenised Work may have been based on one or more pre-existing works, which may have been digital (such as a digital photograph) or physical (such as a canvas or film reel): the pre-existing work will be owned as an asset–either by the original artist, or by a commissioner/purchaser; and intellectual property rights also subsist in and to the pre-existing work. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Fundraisers Are Hitting High Notes at Taylor Swift and Beyoncé Concerts MSN – Hailey Fuchs (Politico) | Published: 11/8/2023 In a twist on the meet-and-greet events that routinely dot the fundraiser party circuit, some members of Congress are shaking hands with donors and others at concert venues, in VIP boxes, or suites. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]