Search for: "Harris v. Miller"
Results 281 - 300
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
Miller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Joe Miller: Yeah. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
After Mr Harris had provided a review of the facts, he handed over to Richard Miller QC, who started by drawing attention to previous House of Lord decisions (Mulkerrin’s [2003] 1 WLR 1937 (HL); Vervaeke v Smith [1983] AC 145) in which the Court held that res judicata is a form of estoppel that should apply “even though the decision may be wrong”. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
Div. 2011) (citing §201.57 as authority for off-label drug warnings); see Harris v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Kneafsey v Independent Television, 11 December 2013 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:33 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC33704 - Harris v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
[Graham] went to a Harris–Teeter at about 6:30 a.m. to buy milk, and returned home. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am
The most likely source for the offending quote, if true, was the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision on executive power in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
My biweekly column slot this week roughly coincides with the beginning of the new academic year at most law schools across the country. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
