Search for: "Hastings v. U.s" Results 281 - 300 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
| The U.S. presidential election of 1876: votes, cannabis and intellectual property| CJEU upholds duty to reverse-engineer trade marks in Rubik's cube decision, but what about the actual v abstract test? [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The analysis also has broader implications for the future of the U.S. government’s pandemic response abilities and for judges committed to “ordinary meaning. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:59 pm
Geoffrey Hazard of Hastings Law School, who addresses why European business really fear U.S. state courts. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
Geoffrey Hazard of Hastings Law School, who addresses why European business really fear U.S. state courts. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 9:59 pm
Geoffrey Hazard of Hastings Law School, who addresses why European business really fear U.S. state courts. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:10 am by JD Hull
Geoffrey Hazard of Hastings Law School, who addresses why European business really fear U.S. state courts. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981) (noting that the limited purpose of and haste surrounding a preliminary injunction allow "evidence that is less complete than in a trial on the merits"). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At CrimProfBlog and the UC Hastings College of the Law’s faculty blog, Rory Little takes another look at Manuel v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sponsor: Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] (introduced 4/29/2010) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 4/29/2010 By unanimous consent, the Hastings (WA) amendment was withdrawn. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down the judgment in Riley v Murray [2020] EWHC 997 (QB). [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 7:54 am
Because the Supreme Court made the guidelines voluntary in January 2005, in a case called U.S. v. [read post]