Search for: "Henry v. Marks" Results 281 - 300 of 590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Katfriend and occasional guest contributor Aaron Wood tells all.* Invalidating an absent litigant's trade marks: yes, of course it can be doneJeremy further reflects on Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The caption of the famous Selden car case which found Henry Ford did not infringe the Selden patent is -- Columbia Motor Car Co. et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
He quickly calmed our nerves and by the end of the session had us all strutting the room as if we were on stage at the Theatre Royal, bellowing lines from Shakespeare’s Henry V. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:58 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
 John Golden described the Federal Circuit's decision to review laches and exhaustion rules en banc and analyzed the debate in Teva v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
And Judge Hand, in an earlier case (Nichols v Universal Pictures) involving not a music but a play (Abie’s Irish Rose), had this to say: The plaintiff has prepared an elaborate analysis of the two plays, showing a “quadrangle” of the common characters, in which each is represented by the emotions which he discovers. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]