Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 281 - 300
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
However, the case is certain to prove to be a key FLSA precedent, the first since the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling in Hoffmann-LaRoche v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm
Along with the contributions of Lord Judge, Lord Hoffmann and Lady Justice Arden, this address forms part of an elegant but increasingly intense debate that reflects unease about Strasbourg. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
The justices unanimously reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision that the transaction met the standard Khan v. [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
In 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:49 pm
victories in fight for European BRCA patents (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Europe: European Commission proposes strategy for dealing with rare diseases (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings) US: Former House Ways and Means Economist claims 7-year data exclusive period is sufficient (Patent Docs) US: Medco predicts follow-on biologics regulatory pathway by 2011 (Patent Docs) US: Even after patent has expired, District Court has jurisdiction to set exclusivity date: In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Following the IPKat's earlier post on the German Bundesgerichtshof decision on Lundbeck's escitalopram patent, the Kat's plea for an English translation of the German original has been kindly answered by German IP practice Hoffmann Eitle. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
To be precise, seven decisions of Areios Pagos have applied the findings of the ECJ in the case FBTO Schadeverzekeringen NV v Jack Odenbreit. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 541 F.3d. 1115, 1126 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
I readily acknowledge that, as Lord Hoffmann pointed out in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, 1372, reasons should be read on the assumption that, unless she has demonstrated the contrary, the decision maker knew how she should perform her functions and which matters she should take into account. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
It has been 15 years since the last brand v brand challenge of a biologic patent in Canada. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 8:12 am
Hoffmann v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm
Lord Hoffmann. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
No…On the question of the implied term, HHJ Hacon found Lord Hoffmann’s comments in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10(a judgment of the Board of the Privy Council) instructive. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
Arnold LJ focused on a point made clear by Lord Hoffmann in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am
(Patent Docs) Xeloda (Capecitabine) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed in response to Para IV certification: Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1129 (Fed. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
