Search for: "House of Cash Inc" Results 281 - 300 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
The Clearing House on the Race for Real-Time Payments in the USPYMNTS – August 10, 2020 Real time is getting ever closer to prime time. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
McColly Realtors, Inc. and Saxon Drywall, Inc., a 17-page opinion, Judge May writes:Christine Masick fell on a temporary step and hit her head while looking at a house that was under construction and listed for sale with McColly Realtors. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Richard Hunt
Rent due dates and the Fair Housing Act Fair Hous. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
These ineligible costs included $621,191 in personal service costs and $33,864 in other than personal service costs. http://osc.state.ny.us/audits/allaudits/093016/14s40.pdfKew Gardens SEP Inc.; Compliance with Reimbursable Cost ManualFor the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, auditors identified $295,997 in reported costs that did not comply with SED requirements and recommend such costs be disallowed. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
 Uppercase is Senate action; lowercase is House action. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by admin
    – were in some stage of foreclosure as of June, according to research firm RealtyTrac Inc. of Irvine, California. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:17 pm by fraudfighters
The HHAs involved in this case are Apple of Your Eye Health Care Services, Inc., owned by Cynthia Stiger and Wilbert James Veasey, Jr.; Ultimate Care Home Health Services, Inc., owned by Cyprian Akamnonu and Patricia Akamnonu, R.N.; and Charry Home Care Services, Inc., owned by Charity Eleda, R.N. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:23 am
  As housing-finance consulting detective Sherlock Holmes explained, a buyer acquiring a home with no hard equity invested violates fundamental market principles:   "Putting up hard cash is proof that you have hard cash to put up? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]