Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 281 - 300 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Then came Snowden’s revelations about NSA surveillance, Klayman’s suit for injunctive relief against the President and other officials–and, ultimately, Judge Leon’s Fourth Amendment ruling. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  This requirement was aimed at chilling the efforts of itinerant, out-of-state screening physicians, whose conduct came under scrutiny in In re Silica.[11] Daubert, Its Progeny, and Amended Rule of Evidence 702 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert was not only a watershed in the analysis of expert evidence generally but also reflected specific concerns about expert testimony in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:10 am by SHG
“You have to show that there’s this really close nexus between why you’re using race and the outcome you’re seeking,” said Melissa Murray, a professor of law at New York University. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am by Russell Knight
” “[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
In ruling on this argument, the Court of Appeals noted that Indiana Rule of Evidence 606(b) governs inquiries into the validity of a verdict, i.e., polling a jury. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:53 pm by Brannon Denning
Tushnet is largely silent about constitutional law (as opposed to constitutional structure) until the end of Chapter 1, when he speculates that the Supreme Court’s application of the First Amendment to campaign finance reforms might have had some meaningful effect on these political developments. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:25 am
§ §6 and 8 shall take effect on 9/9/07 the one hundred eightieth day after this act shall have become a law; c. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
The Commission has looked and issued papers about multi-jurisdictional practice, rules revisions, outside ownership of law firms, admission by motion, chioce of conflicts law, and other cutting edge issues. 7. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
Closing this gap in the legal framework will help law enforcement crack down on the entire cast of characters involved in animal fighting, including those who finance the activity with admission fees and gambling wagers, provide cover to animal fighters during raids, and expose children to the violence and bloodletting. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance)   Global - Copyright A bit about derivative works (Ip's What's Up)     Australia Singapore Treaty takes effect March 2009 (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Capital allowances: business related costs – business transfer arrangement establishing right to intellectual property (IP Down Under) Droit de suite scheme introduced into Parliament (International Law Office) Interlocutory relief partially granted in Sebel Furniture… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(Inovia) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm by Michael Markarian
Closing this gap in the legal framework will help law enforcement crack down on the entire cast of characters involved in animal fighting, including those who finance the activity with admission fees and gambling wagers, provide cover to animal fighters during raids, and expose children to the violence and bloodletting. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
They’re running a little behind this year, so it looks like the last opinions will come down Tuesday or possibly even Wednesday of this week. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
As I reported on the Provincial Governments tariff last year: Eleven years ago, Access Copyright filed a tariff seeking $15 for each full time equivalent employee from provincial and territorial governments. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In an initial effort to respond to these developments and pressures, EBSA amended the general standards for delivery of required disclosures in 2002 by establishing a regulatory safe harbor for the use of electronic media (the “2002 safe harbor”) under 29 CFR 2520.104b-1(c). [read post]