Search for: "IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT" Results 281 - 300 of 439
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 8:55 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ARB AWARDS UNDER THE TEXAS GENERAL ARBITRATION ACT    Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ARB AWARDS UNDER THE TEXAS GENERAL ARBITRATION ACT    Jones v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 10:53 am by Stefan Padfield
[constitutes the] kind of judicial second guessing [that] the business judgment rule was designed to prevent, and even if a complaint is framed under a Caremark theory, this Court will not abandon such bedrock principles of Delaware fiduciary duty law. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
”   According to a knowledgeable insider who worked at the California State Bar Association at the time, the State Bar had no history of lawyers committing acts of misconduct related to loan modifications until the very end of 2008 when complaints started to trickle in, and then in 2009, inundate the Bar with 800-900 a month. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
”   According to a knowledgeable insider who worked at the California State Bar Association at the time, the State Bar had no history of lawyers committing acts of misconduct related to loan modifications until the very end of 2008 when complaints started to trickle in, and then in 2009, inundate the Bar with 800-900 a month. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:00 pm
Similarly, relying on judicial monitoring and reporting of misconduct has been a failure. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The complaint did not seek judicial dissolution of Sapphire.Following a series of inconclusive skirmishes over discovery disputes, in November 2011 the JG Minority Members by their own counsel filed a motion for leave to intervene as plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The complaint did not seek judicial dissolution of Sapphire.Following a series of inconclusive skirmishes over discovery disputes, in November 2011 the JG Minority Members by their own counsel filed a motion for leave to intervene as plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:57 am by Betsy McKenzie
Now, spurred by his complaints, and probably by coverage of his complaints in the press, the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC) has taken up the case. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by lawmrh
All Judge Baumgartner had to do to get his wrist so gently stroked was to plead guilty to official misconduct, a lower level Class “E” felony. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
Improper for Court to Take Judicial Notice of Factual Material in Filed Net Worth Statement. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  All of these mechanisms the court said are operating to make sure that in most cases prosecutors know what they’re supposed to do and that it’s only in an extreme case that would be completely unpredictable where they’re going to fail. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:52 am by Daniel Schwartz
” The pilot is getting strong support; the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules has encouraged judges to join the pilot. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:03 am by lawmrh
In its report, disciplinary counsel noted, “The nature of the misconduct at issue involves deception, abuse of judicial authority, failure to disqualify, and allowing personal and family circumstances to influence judicial conduct. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Christopher Perry, 65, said he would now consider the possibility of pursuing judicial review of the Hull Magistrates Court decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "We find, prima facie, that the respondent is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest based upon his failure to cooperate with the lawful demands of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee), with respect to its investigation of one complaint of professional misconduct. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:04 pm by Sarah Waldeck
 In exchange the Georgia Judicial Qualification Commission dropped the complaints of misconduct against the Judge, who presided over the state’s largest drug court. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
  For instance, Judge Hand’s complaints about the “literary critic” expert witness in Nichols, have been re-lodged against witnesses with expertise in ethics. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It was re-filed during the most recent session but went nowhere.)Another recommendation I'd have is better communication with the public about judicial misconduct when they discover it. [read post]