Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
A chance to expand police oversight: Why Texas should begin charging cops and jailers licensure fees
26 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm
It's great that they're catching violations after the fact, but that's an awfully high rate of deficient audits.Moreover, Texas is one of only a handful of states where the peace-officer licensing agency can't revoke licenses of officers for serious misconduct. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
Imagine if you're random content creator, and you're told that your work violates some IP by MegaCorp. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
According to the statute, if the information is not “content” and collection takes place abroad, FISA doesn’t apply. 50 USC 1801(f)(4). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
I noted that, while the Texas attorney population had increased by about 40% (an increase from 56,000 to 88,000 thousand lawyers in less than 20 years), the number of lawyers disciplined for professional misconduct had decreased by roughly 50% (from roughly 600 lawyers disciplined in the mid-1990s to an average of 300 lawyers disciplined in recent years). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:59 pm
Sotomayor then asked whether an employee could be fired for texting her husband during school hours if that violated school rules. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Id. at p. 50.) [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
Disability Discrimination — from WinWinHR Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees — from Suits by Suits Clearing up Sexual Harassment — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Another harassment myth, debunked: “If we don’t have a policy, we can’t get in trouble for violating it” —… [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
Disability Discrimination — from WinWinHR Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees — from Suits by Suits Clearing up Sexual Harassment — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Another harassment myth, debunked: “If we don’t have a policy, we can’t get in trouble for violating it” —… [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:34 pm
The action is styled as In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
We’re not sure yet if the archbishop will listen to the stories of the victims. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The IRS claimed that this rule would raise more than $50 billion over the next decade. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Occasionally, the other side's argument might not just be offensive but might violate legal ethics rules, for instance if it involves a personal attack on us; but those are just a small fraction of the arguments that may be understandably upsetting. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:04 am
" Note that last week, the PCAOB settled a disciplinary order censuring Ernst & Young for the largest civil penalty it has ever imposed - $2 million, sanctioning four of its current and former partners for violating it rules and standards. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:29 am
On March 22, it will be 50 years since The Beatles released their first album. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
Second, with respect to remedies specifically: Historically, once regulators found that an advertiser violated the law, that violation provided justification for future prophylactic measures. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:09 am
“The public feels like the Supreme Court took this away from them over 50 years ago [with a ruling against mandatory school prayer]. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
Each disciplined according to rule 3 in safety equipment violation. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
*Re: An American Third Party.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
The disability had been based on a 1991 misdemeanor marijuana conviction, and the court ruled that disqualifying the defendant from owning a gun on that basis violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense, under the Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:57 am
” In re Marriage of Knoll, 2016 IL App (1st) 152494, ¶ 50, 65 N.E.3d 878. [read post]
