Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF M.J."
Results 281 - 300
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm
The JTAC did not help matters with instructions such as “soften the target,” which did not correspond to the situation the crew was viewing in real time. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Rose, 67 M.J. 630 (A. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:44 am
Brown, 65 M.J. 356, 358 (C.A.A.F., 2007) (doing this “[does] not create a duplicitous specification”). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
Easton, 70 M.J. 507, 512 (A. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
This approach is necessary to give meaning to the Supreme Court's conclusion that "liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
" In Re the Matter of M.J., Elika Jackson, and Carl Jackson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
Tucker, 20 M.J. 52 (C.M.A. 1985), from the threat of being overturned by arguing that Congress hasn't objected to Tucker. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:05 am
” Loyalist and Alabama Judge M.J. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Zellers, [1996] M.J. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:20 am
Lonetree, 35 M.J. 396, 412 (C.M.A. 1992). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:54 am
Long, 64 M.J. 57 (C.M.A. 2006); People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
McGuinness, 35 M.J. 149, 153 (C.M.A. 1992). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
Maxwell, 45 M.J. 406, 418 (C.A.A.F. 1996) (“[T]he maker of a telephone call has a reasonable expectation that police officials will not intercept and listen to the conversation; however, the conversation itself is held with the risk that one of the participants may reveal what is said to others. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:10 am
Each party will try to impose its own language, so as to avoid linguistic risks, and the election will become a matter of negotiation. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
M.J. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
LEXIS 1218 (LA 5/11/2010) “Following remand, this matter returns to this court on appeal from the trial court’s determination that defendant, James Dunn, is not mentally retarded and is therefore not exempt from capital punishment. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Aug. 29, 2012) (Papak, M.J.) [9] Id. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:34 am
However, there is still the matter of the adultery conviction, which involved a defective Art. 134 specification. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:21 am
Osorio, 66 M.J. 632 (U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Sawyer, and M.J. [read post]
