Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY."
Results 281 - 300
of 992
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm
We’ve discussed Grand Juries before, see “Grand Jury in Texas: Defending Witnesses and Targets of Grand Jury Investigations. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
As an initial matter, Rogers considers the committee’s request that the district court summarizes the argument, “exercise its continuing supervisory jurisdiction concerning the grand jury to authorize and order the release of grand jury records. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:17 am
" And Grand Juries are still going forward. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:04 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, March 10, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs will hold a hearing on the State Department's budget request for the fiscal year 2021. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, March 2, 2020, at 4:00 p.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold a conversation on Defending NATO’s eastern flank with Jüri Luik, Estonia’s minister of defense. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 12:14 pm
The grand jury’s deliberations take the place of the examining trial hearing before the magistrate. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, February 24, 2020, at 11:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will host an event to discuss the Libyan civil war. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm
Back then fewer than ten people were milling about in that hall before the opening of that proceeding. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
Two weeks ago, the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (TJP), which was known as the Tribunal de Grande Instance (TGI) until the turn of the year, handed down an order in TCL v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
In one letter, Jefferson wrote that the "prosecution of Burr had begun under very inauspicious symptoms by the challenging & rejecting two members of the grand jury. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm
The responsibilities of a Attorney at the NSA can include: Advising the Agency on legal matters involving a particular subject matter (e.g., ensuring compliance with constitutional, statutory, regulatory, procedural, and policy requirements for intelligence operations) Analyzing proposed changes to legislation, programs, policies, regulations, or plans to determine impact on the Agency Representing the Agency's official position in legal and legislative proceedings,… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
Craig, 2006-Ohio-4571 (2006) (Allowing evidence of prior bad acts that had been previously rejected by a grand jury to be admitted in a subsequent criminal prosecution.) [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Subjecting a senior presidential advisor to the congressional subpoena power would be akin to requiring the President himself to appear before Congress on matters relating to the performance of his constitutionally assigned executive functions. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:17 am
Grand jury deliberations are very secretive processes. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:15 pm
” In theory, however, the argument that the evidence does not matter is not completely crazy. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
The 1973 OLC Memo concluded impeachment is not a prerequisite to the indictment and trial of an officer of the United States government, noting: In sum, the analysis of the text of the Constitution and its practical interpretation indicate that the Constitution does not require the termination of impeachment proceedings before an officer of the United States may be subjected to criminal proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:25 am
While grand jury proceedings are generally secret (G.S. 15A-623(e)), indictments are not usually considered confidential documents. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:12 pm
As many have explained, the House impeachment investigation was analogous to a grand jury investigation, with the resulting impeachment vote akin to a decision to indict. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
And that examination is essential to consider whether impeachment should be the next constitutional step in the ever-escalating dispute over information in times of divided government—or whether we should hesitate before advocating for such a step. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
A common refrain among Republican legislators and others, including some Democrats, has been that the House should have litigated these constitutional disputes in the courts before making their assertion the basis for impeachment. [read post]
