Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection Privacy International (PI) has an article calling for the facial recognition company Clearview AI to be banned. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
For more on this issue, see the report by Transparency International’s Argentine branch, Poder Ciudadano (citizen power). [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
They may also originate in state action, either to support private rights or to allow state agents (law enforcement officials, tax collectors, and so on) to do their business. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
That happened with S.94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and, arguably, with bulk interception under RIPA. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
Will the Act foster trust in the system that it sets up? [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIMITED and STANCHART SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
There is a degree of international recognition that the operators of search engines should put in place such a system (which could obviously either be on a voluntary basis or put upon a statutory footing) to take account of legitimate complaints about legally objectionable material. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
From 2004 to 2007 he led the Office for Specialized International Cooperation of the Iranian Space Agency. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
Although even the CJEU must allow for some differences in Member State domestic laws, it is in principle able to be more pre [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
The Ohio Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources within the State of Ohio. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
However, many commentators thought that such injunctions in relation to future infringement applied only to to intellectual property claims, as provided for specifically in statute, until the recent case of Cartier International and Others v BskyB and others ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)). [read post]