Search for: "In Interest of Gonzales"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Drug laws have been held to be justified under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause; RFRA exemptions from drug laws, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
And Justice Kennedy, whose vote was essential to the holding, emphasized that RFRA cannot be applied to “unduly restrict other persons, such as employees, in protecting their own interests, interests the law deems compelling. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
In numerous past cases, the Court has recognized free exercise protections (including under RFRA) for non-profit business associations (e.g., Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Consider drug laws — where some religious groups’ claims prevail (see the hoasca case from the Supreme Court, Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
See Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:54 pm
While Judge Yvonne Gonzales-Rogers may ultimately decide the documents cannot be released, her order reveals an appreciation of the civil liberties concerns and her skepticism of the government’s blanket refusal to release any portion of the opinions. [read post]
14 May 2014, 3:47 am
Gonzales that there already was a right to be forgotten, and Google better shape up. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
This is a pretty interesting case in and of itself, especially if one reads the amicus brief of the Cato Institute and the humorist P.J. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
In O Centro the government argued that it had a compelling interest in the uniform enforcement of the drug laws. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
Here’s how Chief Justice John Roberts put it in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
87; Gonzales at para. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
So, by enacting RFRA, Congress and the president responded to the Court’s invitation and specifically invited – indeed, required – what the Justices (without dissent) called in Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
” “Finally, if you’re interested in co-sponsoring an event with us in the future, please let us know; we would be delighted to work with you. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
Why, then, does the Court apparently think that it can apply RFRA notwithstanding Smith‘s pronouncement that the application of the compelling interest test to weigh religious freedom against government interests is unconstitutional? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
In some situations, a court may conclude that denying a religious exemption is indeed necessary to serve a compelling government interest. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
That was the government’s approach, albeit a losing one, in Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Question: In one of your charts in Storm Center you provide some interesting figures about the Court’s subject matter docket between 1825 and 2010. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
Gonzales proposes procedures and safeguards for when the US government targets an American citizen for death. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:01 am
Here are two quite recent papers, both of obvious interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
But the discussion of the questioning about Christian doctrine struck me as interesting enough to mention on its own. [read post]
