Search for: "In RE: Asbestos Litigation" Results 281 - 300 of 525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm by Bexis
  In In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 2015791 (M.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:06 pm by Walter Olson
” [TheDenverChannel.com] At “public interest watchdog” FairWarning.org, who contributed this article about Canadian asbestos controversies? [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Cyber Warfare and Collateral Damage: “Flame” Malware Heats Up Data Security Threat – Philadelphia lawyer Eric Packel of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin on the Data Breach Legal Watch  NLRB General Counsel Issues Third Report on Social Media Cases – Philadelphia attorney Joel Barras of Reed Smith on their blog, Employment Law Watch Litigation is Not War, Nor Should it Be – Texas lawyer Tom Crane on his San Antonio Employment… [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am by David Oliver
Attack the premises - they're made of clouds. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:00 pm
As we've previously reported in our Boston Mesothelioma Lawyers' Blog, more than 100 companies deemed responsible for lethal asbestos exposure have filed for bankruptcy and established trusts in order to pay out claimants and minimize litigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
such as the asbestos-related issue in O’Neal can get their attention ? [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:09 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Div. 1st Dep’t, Jan. 24, 2012 The case arose out of litigation concerning the underlying asbestos claims spanning several decades. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:30 am
So with a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, they can re-organize the business in such a way that they establish an asbestos trust that they regularly pay into. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am by Bexis
 A few years ago Bexis got involved in asbestos-related expert witness issues in a big way, and in particular has devoted almost a decade (working through the Product Liability Advisory Council (“PLAC”)) trying to stamp out so-called “any exposure” causation opinions in asbestos litigation in Pennsylvania (and more lately, elsewhere). [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:46 pm by Schachtman
  Sometimes the data may be re-analyzed, and the march of progress is in the direction of having underlying data accessible to permit some degree of re-analysis. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Back in the early days of the asbestos litigation in Philadelphia, a hotbed of early asbestos litigation, plaintiffs and defendants each identified a pool of available expert witnesses on lung diseases. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am by Schachtman
  For instance, in the litigation over claims that asbestos causes colorectal cancer, plaintiffs had only a relative risk statistic to support their desired inference that asbestos had caused their colorectal cancers. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:13 pm by Jon L. Gelman
" "In sum, section 524 trusts are the only national statutory scheme extant to resolve asbestos litigation through a quasi-administrative process. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:06 pm by David Oliver
"Litigating Toxic Risks", funded under a $366,785 research grant for "Toxic Ignorance and the New Right-to-Know: The Implications of Biomonitoring for Regulatory Science", proceeds from the hypothesis that "toxic tort litigation has emerged as a means of controlling risks. [read post]