Search for: "In Re Austin C." Results 281 - 300 of 514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rihanna: High Court decided this was passing off, on the merit of those particular facts, b/c there had been a previous relationship w/Rihanna and Top Shop. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also one reason for the huge expense is b/c courts have set the bar so high. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Austin Business Lawyer | Corporate Lawyer And Business Attorney - CPA. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
ARBITRABILITY OF HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS: FAA PREEMPTION AND MFA REVERSE PREEMPTION IN THE MED-MAL CONTEXT In an opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court holds that the federal law that accords states the right to regulate the business of insurance (McCarran-Ferguson Act) does not furnish an exception to the general principle that the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) preempts the TAA (Texas Arbitration Act) and other state arbitration laws when the two conflict, where the… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
If you’re wondering what they’re looking at specifically, Foley & Lardner has a great in-depth breakdown. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Louis University Robert Chesney bobbychesney Texas Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa SUNY Buffalo Adam Chilton adamschilton Chicago Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Kenneth Ching kennyching Regent Cyra Akila Choudhury cyrachoudhury Florida International Allison Christians taxpolblog McGill Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron daniellecitron Maryland Bradford Clark profbradclark George Washington Sherman Clark shermanjclark Michigan Brian Clarke… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Austin, 14-271, a state-on-top habeas case from the Fourth Circuit, asks whether a reviewing court may presume that a trial judge acted “vindictively” in giving a defendant a higher sentence after resentencing, when no higher court had vacated the trial judge’s original sentence. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re argues that, if the Court were once again to grant review in Fisher v. [read post]