Search for: "In Re Curry"
Results 281 - 300
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
With mounting pressure to “do more with less,” the EEOC is re-imagining itself. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
His deft comparison of supplement-pushers with old-timey hucksters of Curry’s Cancer Cure (hydrogen peroxide, iodine, laxatives and cocaine) and Radio-Sulpho Cancer Cure (Epsom salts and Limburger cheese) animates medical history. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 2:23 pm
* Sean Gilday (Page Hargrave) started well, but ran into trouble at the end, with his "Elite Patents County Court: re perp, I'll rep". [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:49 am
See In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1470 (Fed. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:00 pm
See In re Ngai, 367 F.3d 1336, 1339 (Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
My takeaway from this exchange is that District Attorneys around the state now should be obligated to go back and re-examine their old cases to identify all defendants who've been convicted of this non-crime and notify them. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:07 am
(Re-)nationalization: from technique to context. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:12 am
See Ex parte Curry, 84 USPQ2d1272, 1274 (BPAI 2005) (informative) (Fed. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Collateral estoppel has its place, and courts should not entertain the same parties in re-litigating already-determined issues without putting thought to the equities involved. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:09 am
See we’re getting old and cranky already and we’re not the only ones. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:56 am
He said: “I hope that they’re not using a sledgehammer to crack a nut here. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:52 am
Cir. 2006) (citing In re Ngai, 367 F.3d 1336, 1339 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:13 am
We’re not unlike our clients in that respect. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:33 pm
” (The full text of Klein's comments re the application can be found here and here.) [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:15 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesWIRWT #270 (the “… and the home of the brave” edition)WIRTW #269 (the “roshambo” edition)WIRTW #268 (the “… in a box” edition) [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:39 am
Today perhaps a practice of under-valuation, as a way to curry favor with local voters or due to Proposition 13-style limits. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:53 am
You will both curry favor with your judge and advance your client’s interests. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm
” Where the offspring in trademark families are afforded rights before they’re even born, you don’t ever have to use “McLikelihood” or “McConfusion” to sue McColeman or anyone else to sue for McFringement and win. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
See In re Lowry, 32 F.3d 1579, 1583 (Fed. [read post]
