Search for: "In Re Related Asbestos Cases" Results 281 - 300 of 456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 2:30 am by Jon L. Gelman
  In re Air Crash Near Clarence Center New York on February 12, 2009 v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:04 am
Further, he doesn't consider anything short of a cure to be a victory against this devastating asbestos-related disease. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
In other cases, it means living with a family member whose work exposed them to asbestos. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
DRILL DOWN FOR DATA Scholz said the lack of clear legal precedents meant lawyers had to draw analogies from other energy-related cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm by Schachtman
  In asbestos litigation, for instance, the defense would find any and all pulmonary physicians who was treating a worker with asbestos-related disease to be off limits to consulting or testifying. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am by David Oliver
" The point is made explicitly a few pages later when the court refers back to its discussion in Gregg about the plaintiff's proof problem in such cases: "... we do not believe that it is a viable solution to indulge in a fiction that each and every exposure to asbestos, no matter how minimal in relation to other exposures, implicates a fact issue concerning substantial-factor causation in every "direct-evidence" case. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:15 am by Rantanen
Some were dangerous (lead paint and asbestos), some were ridiculous, and some were enduring. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:00 pm
We know that the first asbestos-related claims started trickling in in the 1960s. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
  The case before the Second Circuit, In re Quigley Co., 2012 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
such as the asbestos-related issue in O’Neal can get their attention ? [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am by Bexis
 A few years ago Bexis got involved in asbestos-related expert witness issues in a big way, and in particular has devoted almost a decade (working through the Product Liability Advisory Council (“PLAC”)) trying to stamp out so-called “any exposure” causation opinions in asbestos litigation in Pennsylvania (and more lately, elsewhere). [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:46 pm by Schachtman
  Sometimes the data may be re-analyzed, and the march of progress is in the direction of having underlying data accessible to permit some degree of re-analysis. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
  Dozens of epidemiologic studies have shown that asbestos exposures of bystander trades, chrysotile factory workers, and other non-insulator, occupational exposures have lower risks of asbestos-related diseases. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Normally bankruptcy does not expand pre-petition contracts or impose different risks on contracting parties, but it appears that when the courts are firmly convinced of the public good of creating an asbestos trust, insurance contracts at least can be re-written. 11 U.S.C §524(g) was added to the Bankruptcy Code after the historic Johns Manville asbestos bankruptcy case to codify the use of a trust and channeling injunction to allow asbestos… [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am by Schachtman
  For instance, in the litigation over claims that asbestos causes colorectal cancer, plaintiffs had only a relative risk statistic to support their desired inference that asbestos had caused their colorectal cancers. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:19 am by Emma Durand-Wood
Time just flies when you’re working hard, like our clients have been over the last month. [read post]