Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products" Results 281 - 300 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
"Certain diseases have very long latency periods, from the time you're exposed to the onset of the disease, therefore looking at what you have today doesn't tell you much about what you're going to see in the future," Wood said. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Epstein recited the Selikoff multiplicative “synergy” theory, with relative risks of 5 (for non-smoking asbestos workers), 10 (for smoking non-asbestos workers), and 50 (for smoking asbestos-exposed workers). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 1:48 pm
Tobacco and asbestos companies asserted that they had Fifth Amendment rights to keep secret what they knew about the dangers of their products. [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:13 pm
If you're a Republican, you're an idiot not to support tort "reform. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm by Michael Grossman
Almost regardless of what we’re doing, we perspire. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm by Levin Papantonio
Tisi serves as co-chair of the Plaintiffs’ Discovery for In Re: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MD 2738 (D.N.J.). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:41 am by Thomas Nantias
This can be anything from a car accident to a doctor’s error to an unsafe product. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
[www.nylj.com] Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted: APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTProducts LiablityClaims on Firm's Asbestos Insulation Subject To Products Liability Coverage, Aggregate Limit Continental Casualty Co., plaintiffs-appellants-respondents v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:58 pm
After a mildly productive cross-examination (where Wood repeatedly discussed his disgust for Locke's ideas), Cassidy yielded the floor to Bernick for re-direct. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
When an asbestos manufacturer sold asbestos to a sophisticated intermediary -- the Navy -- the manufacturer could be absolved of liability for the Navy's failure to warn its employees of the product's danger. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Does insisting on that legal responsibility represent a turning point in the fight against climate change, similar to when tobacco and asbestos companies were first held liable for harm resulting from their products? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
And there's a chance that you're already eating them.Nanofoods fall into four categories. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
These expectations flow from both the history of the product and from the FTA. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
But in In re Asbestos II Consolidated Pretrial, 1989 WL 56181 (N.D. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:23 pm by Jon Gelman
” To make it easier for people to choose products that effectively reduce the health risks of UV overexposure, the FDA has issued new labeling rules for sunscreen products. [read post]