Search for: "In re: L.J. & L.J"
Results 281 - 300
of 363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Government surveillance powers and practices are often justified with reference to other national security concerns and threats like terrorism, as this House brief on the FISA re-authorization illustrates. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
L.J. 845 , 855 & n.37 (1990)(“Justifying Secrecy”); see generally, CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ET. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005).........60In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) ............... 2, 32 viiLaGrand v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Beck & Azari, “FDA, Off-Label Use, and Informed Consent: Debunking Myths and Misconceptions," 53 Food & Drug L.J. 71 (1998) (available here).Here on the blog, we addressed this topic back in 2007, critiquing an article that advocated informed consent suits against doctors for not discussing the non-FDA-approved status of off-label use, essentially as a means of indirectly punishing drug companies for allegedly promoting such uses too effectively. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
L.J. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The D.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The D.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
" Spencer & Zammit, supra, 1976 Duke L.J. at 913. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
Regulators and courts will have to carefully assess whether public companies manipulated the valuation process to deceive investors or whether stock declines reflect the bursting of a bubble.[2] The equity market selloff in 2022, which contributed to the worst year since 2008 for the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, has exposed U.S. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm
L & Policy 41 (2013). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
Attorneys for the plaintiffs are Michel & Associates, the leading California firm on firearms law. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:33 pm
Working Papers Coalition for Peace & Ethics No. 2/1 (February 2019) From the Social to the Human Rights of Labor: Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Art. 23, the ILO, and Working Rights Principles Larry Catá Backer Abstract: Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights represents the culmination of a substantial transformation in the conceptual baselines for developing legal and normative frameworks respecting work and workers. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
This essay is not a normative argument in defense of deference, but rather an account of how the District Court in Texas boldly—and without discussion or acknowledgment—did away with such deference in ordering the Biden administration to re-start MPP, and how the Supreme Court, in refusing to stay the injunction, seemed not to mind. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Rothman was encouraged to target these three issues by the lower courts’ opinions in the Daubert case, in which the courts made blanket statements about the role of absent statistical significance and peer review, and the illegitimacy of “re-analyses” of published studies. [read post]
