Search for: "In re C.J" Results 281 - 300 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by The Legal Blog
The Supreme Court has re-iterated that the Constitution doesn't allow class legislation but permits reasonable classification, based upon an 'intelligible differentia'. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
Snider [1925] A.C. 396 per Viscount Haldane), or, as Justice Jean Beetz put it, “a national emergency of the same significance as war, pestilence or insurrection”—including (and Beetz J. here dissented) double-digit inflation (Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
(Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Gascon, Brown JJ. concurring) found that the mandatory victim fine surcharge constitutes punishment, engaging s. 12 of the Charter, and that its imposition and enforcement on several of the offenders, as well as the reasonable hypothetical offender, results in cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
U.S. (1934) reached a similar conclusion: While presidential electors are not officers or agents of the federal government (In re Green), they exercise federal functions under, and discharge duties in virtue of authority conferred by, the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
In May 2016, in Redwater Energy Corporation (Re), 2016 ABQB 278, Wittman C.J. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:57 pm by Durga Rao
P.N.Sharma, AIR 1965SC1595, speaking through our great justice Gajendragadkar, C.J., while holding that the appellate authority under the Punjab Welfare Officers Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1952, is a Tribunal, observed: “…Special matter and questions re entrusted to them for their decision and in that sense, they share with the courts one common characteristic; both the courts and the Tribunals are ‘constituted by the State and are invested… [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
(Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Gascon, Brown JJ. concurring) found that the mandatory victim fine surcharge constitutes punishment, engaging s. 12 of the Charter, and that its imposition and enforcement on several of the offenders, as well as the reasonable hypothetical offender, results in cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
In favor of the Condemned Ex parte Kenneth Eugene Billups (In re: Kenneth Eugene Billups v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]