Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 281 - 300
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
Cannon (@mfcannon) is director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute and coauthor (with Jonathan H. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
(If you’re interested, you can read my Health Matrix article with Michael Cannon and our most recent amicus brief, or watch this October 30 panel at Cato, or my debate with Nicholas Bagley at Michigan.) [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Moyle, D.C.L. of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law,Fellow and Late Tutor of New College, OxfordFifth Edition (1913)http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5983/5983-h/5983-h.htm * PROOEMIVM *In the name of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 12:52 pm
You’re a constable. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:19 pm
The government did not lost on every issue, however, as Lawrence also held that some of the state’s other claims, such as that the employer mandate is unconstitutional on federalism grounds, were barred by res judicata. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
§ 78u‐6(h)(1)). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
They just don’t buy their artificially cramped understanding of how to figure out what the law is. . . . if you’re trying to make sense of a statute, the question for an interpreter is what Congress meant to communicate by the words that it chose. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Natural Res. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 1:05 am
Contents include:Jean Waline & Jean-Paul Costa, In memoriam – Le Doyen Gérard Cohen-Jonathan (1936-2014) Pierre Lambert, Éditorial David Szymczak, Le préjudice important… Un critère inquiétant ? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:24 am
While we’re waiting for the courts to figure out what Hobby Lobby means for contraception coverage, the Supreme Court is already scheduled to revisit the underlying question of religious accommodation. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:35 pm
They’re not even in the top three pairs. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
We’re going somewhere else. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
They’re really trying to intimidate anyone else who might want to pursue similar scholarly lines of inquiry. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:40 am
That’s unlikely, but Professor Zephyr Teachout‘s campaign to deprive incumbent Governor Andrew Cuomo the endorsement of the liberal Working Families Party could complicate his re-election effort and dim his longer term political prospects, according to this NYT report. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:46 am
If you’re one of those waiting for Hobby Lobby, Bond, UARG (the greenhouse gas case), or McCullen v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
While academic freedom has immense value within the walls of the classroom, we’re writing this open letter to you in order to gauge your understanding of the real-world consequences that your work is having, and to invite you into a dialogue with UVA students who are negatively impacted by your work. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Everyone was required to re-apply. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:43 am
In CRS’s view, HHS cannot pay them the $8 billion they’re set to receive through the program.* In a normal political environment, this wouldn’t be a big deal. [read post]
