Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. " Results 281 - 300 of 524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 4:41 am
State, the court of appeals rather ominously stated, In the 50s, before the advent of video cameras and cell phone videos, a popular song advised us that standing on the corner and watching females pass by was acceptable conduct and that “you can’t go to jail for what you’re thinking. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:31 am by Beth Graham
See In re Morgan Stanley & Co., 293 S.W.3d 182, 190 (Tex.2009) (orig.proceeding) (Brister, J., concurring) (stating that breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and malpractice claims were based on client’s contract with broker). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:38 am by Michael Lowe
This month, the Innocence Project filed a grievance with the State Bar of Texas against Navarro County District Attorney John H. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:37 am by Michael Lowe
If you are caught with illegal drugs by law enforcement in a Drug Free Zone, then you’re going to be facing more serious and severe sentencing and more time behind bars than if you were arrested just down the street or even a few yards down the road from the Drug Free Zone. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
We’re proud to partner with the State Bar of Texas in this effort. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In 1920, Robertson ran for re-election, but this time she had a primary opponent. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Hamilton, 372 S.W.3d 140 (Tex. 2012), the Texas Supreme Court pointed out that the plaintiff’s questioning of the prescriber was simply inadequate. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Controversy over a lawyer's suspension and subsequent taking of the bar exam for re-admission to the bar was not sufficient to make the attorney a public figure in Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Controversy over a lawyer's suspension and subsequent taking of the bar exam for re-admission to the bar was not sufficient to make the attorney a public figure in Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Controversy over a lawyer's suspension and subsequent taking of the bar exam for re-admission to the bar was not sufficient to make the attorney a public figure in Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Controversy over a lawyer's suspension and subsequent taking of the bar exam for re-admission to the bar was not sufficient to make the attorney a public figure in Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]