Search for: "In the Matter of: FITNESS HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC."
Results 281 - 300
of 371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
The first possible ground for decision is purely a matter of interpreting the language of the tax statutes. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 5:11 pm
Consumers are telling us that the one-size-fits-all approach to health and wellness is not working for them. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Attorney Preet Bharara said that his "sentence is a fitting conclusion to yet another sordid chapter in the illegal insider trading conspiracies that have become so alarmingly pervasive. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL OFFICE TOWER IN HOUSTON Relators Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
The latter saw enough of a potential conflict in the Christ Church case to recuse himself from participation in it, while Justice Nahmias not only did not see fit to recuse himself, but authored the majority opinions in both cases! [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
" In holding so, the court did not do what was it charged to decide - to determine whether the Red Sole Mark identifies and distinguishes Louboutin as the source - but instead carved out a one-shoe-fits all exception that a single color for fashion items is never subject to protection. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
In Rent-A-Center, West Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert changed practice by holding that Rule 702 required gatekeeping, and by generally slighting Rule 703. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
Cir. 2005) (holding that a court may "rely on extrinsic evidence, such as expert testimony," to determine whether the claims are indefinite) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Seattle Box Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
The Court in the said case observed that having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, this is not a fit case to be entertained to exercise jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:37 am
Home Savings of America, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Id. at 9 (internal quotations and citations omitted). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
NYP Holdings, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:44 pm
” Edstrom Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
Stone, a professor at the Florida International University College of Law. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Ethnicity, Inc. [read post]
