Search for: "JAMES V. BELL" Results 281 - 300 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
James Bell, 80, of Lawn, died October 4, 2020. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
James Bell, 80, of Lawn, died October 4, 2020. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
James Eastland and others to provide "safe" judges. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
According to the Digital Democracy Project, a joint initiative from the Max Bell School of Public Policy at McGill University and the Ottawa-based Public Policy Forum, “disinformation did not play a major role in the 2019 Canadian national election campaign. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Bell, Rutgers Law School; Cary Coglianese, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School; Michael Herz, Benjamin N. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]