Search for: "John Doe Officers 1-4" Results 281 - 300 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 2:36 pm
 That fight ended in a 4-4 per curiam split before the Court (Justice Kagan recused herself- see summary here). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:15 am by INFORRM
” He listed the issues as follows: Issue 1 Had the prosecution established there was a single agreement to commit conspiracy in public office? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists How does the Supreme Court possibly top the excitement of last Friday’s fourteen new grants — including grants in a few important First Amendment cases? [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:46 pm
What We Can Learn from the Rana Plaza Factory Building Collapse," that appears in the UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 1(1):11-66 (2016).The article was a contribution to a symposium, Transnational Legal Ordering and Private Law, held at UC Irvine School of Law. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
John Bogdan, a military police officer and the joint detention group commander at GTMO since June  2012. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork stolen or… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork stolen or… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork stolen or… [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
John Sauer, “So you concede that private acts don’t get immunity? [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews the relists from the “long conference” … barely. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
I start by posting Professor Ruggie’s closing plenary remarks to United Nations Forum on Business & Human Rights in Geneva on December 4, 2014. [read post]