Search for: "LONG v. PARKER"
Results 281 - 300
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Kansas: Parker v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
App. 2nd 324; Parker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
Google and Parker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:57 pm
” Parker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
Google and Parker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
Randy Barnett • May 23, 2012 4:54 pm Jennifer Rubin and Kathleen Parker’s columns today have made me think of another Justice Roberts: Justice Owen Roberts, who is famous for having switched his vote to uphold the New Deal programs in West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:37 pm
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:31 am
Following the Bilski v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
Amniotic Fluid / Amniotic Membrane Tissue Audits, Investigations and Prosecutions are Continuing to Climb in 2022 (August 4, 2022): Over the past year, we have seen a significant increase in the number of Medicare administrative audits, False Claims Act investigations and criminal prosecutions by the Department of Justice (DOJ), related to the billing of allogeneic (harvested from someone else) stem cell products. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
How Long Can a Provider, Supplier, or Prescriber Stay on the CMS Preclusion List? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
While Raymond argues that this case is controlled by Parker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
” This Proposed Rule set out the enrollment revocation and denial changes CMS planned to implement in an effort to address long-standing program integrity risks that have previously been exploited in the past.[5] A little more than three years after the issuance of the March 2016 Proposed Rule, CMS has now issued its much-anticipated Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
” This Proposed Rule set out the enrollment revocation and denial changes CMS planned to implement in an effort to address long-standing program integrity risks that have previously been exploited in the past.[5] A little more than three years after the issuance of the March 2016 Proposed Rule, CMS has now issued its much-anticipated Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Once the government makes an intervention decision, it may no long issue Civil Investigative Demands in a qui tam.[10] If the government decides to intervene in a case, it must rely on traditional discovery tools to build and prove its case. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
Brennan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
This goes back as least as far as Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
" Pursuant to Brown, Parker explained, the Constitution "does not require integration. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
