Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 281 - 300 of 12,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The label assigned by the parties to the relationship between them does not determine if it is that of an employer-employee or as an independent contractorMowry v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 07794, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJohn M. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Overturning a nearly three-decade old legal precedent, a New York appellate court this week ruled that a statement labeling someone as gay cannot be defamatory per se.In the seven-page decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department in the case, Yonaty v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:19 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court’s ruling last month in a case on the limits of jurisdiction, Bauman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 4:48 pm
In a Federalist Society SCOTUScast, appellate lawyer Erin Glenn Busby discusses Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:01 pm by Walter James
The morning session was labeled "Day - Eight" - it should have been labeled as "Day - Seven - Morning Session. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
Label v Label 2010 NY Slip Op 08903 Decided on November 30, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department held that the lower court properly awarded wife attorneys fees for husband’s appeal of the parties’ matrimonial matter. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:19 am by Eric Carpenter
She offers a different set of labels: foundation, bridge, and capstone. [read post]