Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 281 - 300 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In reviewing the case de novo, the court of appeals found that a reasonable factfinder could determine that there was a likelihood of confusion, contrary to the decision of the district court, and reversed and remanded for a bench trial (FCOA LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:13 am
I am left with the impression that Judge Filip understands the issues here, and the applicable law. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
He has written one opinion in an Indian law case, Vann v. [read post]
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:26 am by TJ McIntyre
These are fatal flaws in the plaintiff’s case.Compare the similar decision in USA Rugby v. [read post]
” Although the likelihood of confusion was ordinarily a fact-intensive issue, this was one of the rare instances in which the mark owner’s case was so weak that summary judgment was appropriate, in the Ninth Circuit’s view (Lerner & Rowe PC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:49 am by John McFarland
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio handed down an opinion this week in Adams v. [read post]