Search for: "Light v. Board of Education"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Gomez appealed and the Appellate Division, after sustaining the Commissioner’s determination finding Gomez guilty of the charges filed against him, ruled the penalty imposed by the Commissioner was “excessive in light of the mitigating circumstances, i.e., [Gomez's] several tours of active military duty, including a year in Afghanistan for which was decorated, and the substantial pay lost in connection with his military service,” citing Pell v Board… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1986), case applied, not Garcetti. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
She currently works as an appointed member of the New Jersey Supreme Court Board on Continuing Legal Education, New Jersey State Bar Foundation Respect Newsletter Editorial Advisory Board, New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Minority Concerns, New Jersey State Bar Association Blue Ribbon Commission on Unmet Legal Needs and the New Jersey State Bar Association Membership Committee. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
Ashtabula Area City Schools Board of Education, 2008-Ohio-1892 (11th Dist.) [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Our concerns have only grown in light of the finding of responsibility by Emerson's Conduct Board, which the group is appealing. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:53 am
As to the penalty imposed - dismissal - the Appellate Division said that it was persuaded that the penalty met the Pell standard as it was not “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 11:20 pm
Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am
Board of Education –Nina Totenberg, legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio “The Global Impact of Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Board of Education, Index No. 20053/93, decided July 18, 1995] and Look v Board of Ed. of Lawrence School District, 140 AD2d 440.The court said that records demonstrated that the negotiated severance agreements were legitimate transactions, resolving a genuine dispute concerning the structure and organization of the village's police department in light of the fiscal situation of the village at the time.Justice Dunne also observed that the severance… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
The testator’s intent, "derived from consideration of the will as a whole, read in the light of the circumstances surrounding its execution" (Norton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
| Furry thoughts on Sky v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
The applicant appealed to the EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal (the board) solely on the ground of bad faith within the meaning of Articles 59(1)(b) of the EUTMR. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled nine (9) oral hearings for the month of September, as listed below. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Poughkeepsie appealed the Supreme Court’s ruling and the Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s order annulling Knapp’s decision to terminate Peterson.The Appellate Division said that “Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law” and, citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 am
See Young v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The decision also helps shed light on why it took six years to adjudicate his claims. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
Educators are in a "symbiotic" relationship with students and the Copyright Act serves the goal of education, which includes access to essential material. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am
In today's Wade v Univ. of Michigan, the Michigan Supreme Court sent a challenge to the University of Michigan's gun ban back to the Court of Appeals, for consideration in light of N.Y. [read post]
