Search for: "Long v. United States Internal Revenue Service"
Results 281 - 300
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2024, 6:19 pm
It was quickly embraced by key CPC, political (CPPCC) and State (NPC) organs. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
International Brotherhood. of Teamsters, Local 734 Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“We decided to thank him for his service. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Austin, claiming substantial loss in revenues from work as an expert witness, sued the association. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 1:06 pm
Share on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare by EmailShare Back to top The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and Department of the Treasury last week released final regulations (the “Final Regulations”) relating to the advanced manufacturing production tax credit under Section 45X (“45X Credits”) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
This has long been a major compliance issue and risk factor for many nonprofits. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The appeals court accepted the Internal Revenue Service’s determination that subsidies are available on federally established exchanges as reasonable, and accordingly rejected the challenge. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Both patent law and trademark law are administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
-Canada border called the “Smuggler’s Inn,” by handling Boule roughly during an investigation and also by retaliating against him in violation of the First Amendment by encouraging the Internal Revenue Service to investigate him. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
The separation has been facilitated by the fact that hotel guests do not particularly care who owns the title to the hotel real estate as long as the hotel’s physical facilities and service levels meet their expectations and are predictable, satisfactory, clean and safe. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
However, such practices do not reflect the ‘on-the-ground’ situation at the Member State level nor will these laws serve as a panacea for long-standing, entrenched, and anti-competitive media freedom violations in various EU Member States. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Conference v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The process of making “quiet disclosures” was based upon a long-standing administrative process set out in the Internal Revenue Manual (the “IRM”). [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
