Search for: "MARTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 281 - 300
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 9:58 am
Fortunately for the First Nation, the prior decision isn’t a barrier — at least according to Justice Morgan of the Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:52 am
” The Supreme Court’s decision in Anderson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
The judges of the state's Superior Court recently approved changes to allow defendants to participate in some court proceedings via cameras linked between the courthouse and prison. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm
Superior Court, 16 Cal. 4th 35 (1997)) as well as indemnity (Blue Ridge Ins. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
Cohen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens made clear: Our new government is founded upon . . . its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
Webber also cited an article by NIOSH scientist Martin Harper, who stated the opinion, without evidentiary support that NIOSH did not believe, in 2008, that there was “sufficient evidence for a different toxicity for non-asbestiform amphibole particles that meet the morphological criteria for a fiber. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 9:14 am
From Hill v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),Grand (IP)… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Record Number of Trans and Nonbinary People Are Running for Office MSN – Anne Branigan (Washington Post) | Published: 7/27/2022 In 2017, former journalist Danica Roem made history when she was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates, making her the first out transgender state legislator in the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Zobel, who served on the Massachusetts Superior Court and who had assembled a remarkable collection of Holmes materials over decades of research into the justice’s judicial career — I was able to be the first biographer of Holmes to make a thorough examination of Holmes’ experiences as a trial judge. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]
