Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 281 - 300
of 22,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Supp. 1063, 1065 (D. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
In the end, it only matters that the law firm was given notice of the claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:08 am
Jajati v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:36 am
Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA and others v Enesa Engenharia SA and others [2012] EWCA Civ 638; [2012] WLR (D) 148 “Where a commercial contract contained a choice of law clause exclusively in favour of one country and a jurisdiction clause giving the courts of the same country exclusive jurisdiction, but an arbitration clause by which the seat of the arbitration was to be in a different country, the issue of the proper law of the arbitration clause was a… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
New Jersey Carpenters Vacation Fund v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Cir. 1991); andHester Industries., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:55 am
HUD (D. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 4:05 am
District of Columbia, (D DC, filed 11/18/2020) points out that murals reading "Black Lives Matter" and "Defund the Police" were permitted to be painted along other D.C. streets. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:47 am
Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14; [2012] WLR (D) 3 “A judge’s decision that a party’s foreign proceedings were vexatious or oppressive was an evaluative judgment in a matter on which there was a right or wrong answer, not an exercise of discretion. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
” Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm
Li v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:43 am
Mayr v Bäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG (Case C-506/06): WLR (D) 63 “An employee who was dismissed at a time between the in vitro fertilisation of her ova and the transfer of the fertilised ova to her uterus was not "pregnant" for the purposes of Directive 92/85 on the safety and health at work of pregnant workers, but her dismissal was unlawful under Directive 76/207 on equal treatment for men… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:46 am
Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10); [2011] WLR (D) 188 “The exclusive jurisdiction, conferred by article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, on the courts of the member state in which a company had its seat, was confined to proceedings whose principal subject matter comprised the validity of the constitution, the nullity or the dissolution of the company, or the validity of the decisions of… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Rutgers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:44 am
Order (D. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm
Solvay, S.A. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Slot Machine Patent Invalidated As Being Directed to Ineligible Subject Matter By Joseph Herndon -- Konami sued High 5 Games for patent infringement of U.S. [read post]
19 May 2021, 6:06 am
Here is the order in Mdewakanton Sioux Indians of Minnesota v. [read post]
