Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 281 - 300 of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 10:29 am by Barbara Moreno
McClean, Strategic Planning:  As Simple as A, B, C (2015). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
 The second is Mr Justice Arnold, whose detailed and inevitably lengthy pronouncements on matters of IP law have truly earned the adjective 'Arnoldian' a permanent place in our working vocabulary. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It was found that the disclosure of the invention was of such a general nature that it deprived the skilled person of the information he/she needed to understand how to proceed from the first reaction value collected in step A through steps B, C and D to the determination on a probabilistic basis of the genotype of step E. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by FDABlog HPM
Food & Drug Admin. et al., No. 2009-1495) arguing that a stayed judgment is not a “judgment” within the meaning of FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(B)(iii)(I)(aa) (ANDA) and FDC Act § 505(c)(3)(C)(i) (505(b)(2)) terminating the 30-month stay on approval, and that as a result of the Federal Circuit’s September 10th decision vacating the New Jersey district court’s judgment, the 30-month stay on ANDA/505(b)(2) approval was… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:13 pm by Tessa Shepperson
It is possible that C might be able to buy B’s lease, in which case C’s lease would merge with it and be subsumed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
It does not and should not matter where an amendment is made. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This case considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by INFORRM
(c)  Sweeney J, Eady J, Mann J and Vos J? [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
It objected that the subject-matter of claim 1 and/or claim 2 of the main request and the auxiliary requests corresponding to sets A to C was not novel in view of D1, D2, D4, A006 or A012.X. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Memorandum provides concrete examples a), b) and c) showing how priority has to be assessed. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
B J 1 (estimating the rate of patent approvals by the PTO to be 97%). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
Following hard on the heels of J’s excellent post on the Immigration Bill, we now have further discussion of the EU right to reside rules by the CJEU in Jobcenter Berlin Neukolln v Alimanovic  Case C-67/14 (to which I might say, good luck landlords). [read post]