Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
Five days later, the UK IPO's examiner said MSD's application did not comply with Article 3(b) because at the time of filing their SPC application, they did not have a valid UK MA. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
This is not a small matter. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
J. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Home and Communities Agency v J S Bloor (Wilmslow) Ltd, heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
By Allyson B. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:50 am
The specific ones are: – Engagement in Three or More Sexual Acts with a Minor Under 14 - Penal Code 288.5 – Sexual Penetration of a Minor Under 14 by a Foreign Object - Penal Code 289(j) – Rape - Penal Code 261(d) – Lewd Act on a Child - Penal Code 286 – Oral Copulation on a minor under 14 years of age - Penal Code 286(a) – Sodomy - Penal Code 286(c) Other felonies that cannot be expunged are Vehicle Code… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:59 pm
Herausforderungen und Grundlagen einer europäischen Dogmatik systemischer Defizite J. von Bernstorff & J. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:13 pm
It is possible that C might be able to buy B’s lease, in which case C’s lease would merge with it and be subsumed. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Thomas J. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:38 pm
P. 37(c)(1). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
This is a matter of fact and the council's argument - that "prompt" had to mean before the event actually took place - was not pursued - in Hickinbottom J's view, "properly" not pursued ([39]). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
This is a matter of fact and the council's argument - that "prompt" had to mean before the event actually took place - was not pursued - in Hickinbottom J's view, "properly" not pursued ([39]). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
Will you sell a) to distributors, b) to retailers, c) direct to the public? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 6:28 pm
District Judge Herman J. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Chung, Candice B. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:55 pm
Eric J. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Post hoc judgments are problematic b/c it’s hard to say up front what the primary purpose is. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Dubinsky of counsel), for respondent.Richard J. [read post]
